AGENT OF CHANGE

  1. Search
  2. About
  3. Subscribe
  4. Archive
  5. Random

AGENT OF CHANGE

Notes, thoughts and random comments from music producer, activist and blogger Carlos Martinez (Agent of Change).

http://www.beatknowledge.org/
http://twitter.com/#!/agent_of_change
http://soundcloud.com/agentofchange

  • The ABC of the New Colonial Strategy

    A simple guide to colonialism in the 21st century.

    • Countries A, B and C want to dominate the world’s resources and labour. Country D wishes to develop independently. Irreconcilable contradiction. 
    • A, B and C have money, weapons, media and experience. They might for example stir up conflict between D and E in order to weaken and destabilise D. 
    • They will almost certainly sponsor unrest within D, sending money and offering training to groups that are favourable to A-B-C aims.
    • They might apply economic sanctions against D, the effect of which would be to weaken it and to encourage discontent among its population.
    • Like anywhere else, D is a complex country with its own problems and contradictions. A, B and C will find a way to exploit these. 
    • A, B and C have the clout to ask the ‘international’ financial institutions to apply loan conditions of privatisation and deregulation.
    • Unemployment, rising prices, increasing inequality will help a lot should A, B and C decide to take things to the next level.
    • Just as social unrest is kicking off in D due to years of neoliberal reform, A, B and C find a way to get weapons to opposition groups.
    • The destabilisation is backed by a wide-ranging campaign of criminalisation, demonisation and character assassination of D’s leaders.
    • Naturally, D’s government isn’t going to sit back and be overthrown. So it comes down hard on the attempts to destabilise/overthrow it. 
    • A, B and C now cry out about D’s human rights abuses. Suddenly well-meaning people everywhere are calling for D’s government to be taken out. 
    • Having ensured an absolute minimum of resistance at home, A, B and C go to war to topple D and establish a client state (that recognises I).
    • Human rights abuses in D increase massively under an unpopular, incompetent, kleptocratic administration. But they go largely unreported. 
    • D goes from being relatively affluent to being a failed state. It sees starvation, illiteracy and sectarian killings for the first time in decades.
    • Next year, A, B and C will use the same strategy against E and F. By then, everyone will have forgotten the lessons of D.

    Tagged: libya iraq syria colonialism imperialism empire

    Posted on August 3, 2011 with 10 notes

  • cultureofresistance
  • hendrixnash
  • yearningforunity
  • fuckyeahmarxismleninism
  • djehutiarts
  • aboriginalpressnews
  • samstars
  • lostcauserebel
  • redtideofcommunism
  • liberation-library
  • anotherkindofmind
  • resistance-episteme
  • chavista
  • pablonavarrete
  • socialism-or-barbarism
  • truthbehindsyria
  • anthonyanaxagorou
  • ferrarisheppard
  • lefthistory
  • the13thcatsmeow
  • proletkult
  • safetypin90
  • thevoiceofsyria
  • dreamhampton1
  • rebelreasoner
  • panafricansociety
  • thelionofthedesert
  • i-am-already-dead
  • veganfoodjustice
  • africansarise
  • nadeemfayaz
  • rlugg
  • honestlyabroad
  • marxistclassix
  • fxckthestate
  • ruqayya

Field Notes Theme. Designed by Manasto Jones. Powered by Tumblr.